General Deidentification Customizations

The task

The core MIST deidentification system is implemented as a task within the MAT toolkit. You will not use this core deidentification task directly; rather, you'll be using a further specialization of the core deidentification task, e.g., the AMIA or HIPAA task. Each task is a child task of the parent task class, named "Deidentification", and the implementation of each task is a subclass of the Deidentification.DeidTaskDescriptor Python class. You can see evidence of both these parent-child relationships in the task.xml file for your particular deidentification task.

Creating new deidentification tasks is very, very complicated, and we don't have the resources to document the process. Please consult the specific deidentification tasks you have in your distribution and use them as models if you absolutely need to build your own task.

The annotations

The structural annotations you'll use (see the discussion of annotations here) are just the default structural annotations. The content annotations, which are the ones you'll add or correct, correspond to the PII categories for your task: e.g., the HIPAA categories for medical record deidentification. Refer to the documentation for your specific deidentification task for more details.

Extensions to the available steps

As we describe here, steps are the basic activities that you undertake in a document. E.g., the tokenize step typically identifies the word boundaries in the text. The typical deidentification task has the following steps:

Note that the tokenize step found in the sample MAT task is not used explicitly in MIST.

The nominate step requires a replacer, which is a strategy for generating replacement phrases. We discuss replacers below.

The typical deidentification task arranges these steps into a number of workflows:

What's unusual about these four workflows is that the last of the workflows applies to a different class of documents than the first three. The resynthesize workflow is intended to apply to documents which have been transformed into an obscure form, e.g., documents which contain fillers like [PERSON] in place of the person names in the original document. Under the resynthesize workflow, the tag step is a simple pattern-matching operation, and the replacers convert obscured documents into resynthesized documents. We discuss resynthesis below.

Additional step implementations

The steps of the deidentification task require the following step implementations:

Step implementation name
This step provides default undo capabilities for the compound zone step described above. To be honest, it's not exactly clear why this implementation is necessary.
This step is a step which does nothing, specifically in the case of zoning in the Resynthesize workflow; no zoning is necessary, and we can't permit the default zoning to apply. At the moment, the Resynthesize workflow does not contain a zone step; this implementation may exist for historical reasons.
The implementation of the tag step in the Resynthesize workflow. This tag set merely needs to do pattern-matching, rather than invoke an engine like Carafe.
The implementation of the nominate step.
The implementation of the transform step.

As described here, steps can also take key-value pair arguments which can be specified in the task.xml file or in the invocation of the MAT engine. We document the arguments for these steps here.


The following options might be generally useful for the nominate step:

Command-line option
XML attribute
replacer one of the replacer UI names shown below
The name of the replacement strategy to be used. If the workflow has more than one replacer available, this setting is obligatory. This is most likely the only one of these settings you'll ever use.
replacement_map a string
You can customize your replacement using a JSON string which describes a set of if-then rules which you can apply to your clear -> clear match. See Customizing deidentification replacement below.
replacement_map_file a filename
You can also pass in your replacement customization inside a file.
dont_nominate a string
A comma-separated list of labels for which nominations should not be proposed. By default, nominations are proposed for all content annotations.
flag_unparseable_seeds a string
A comma-separated list of labels whose annotations should be flagged in "clear -> clear" replacement (see below) when the phrase in the original document could not be parsed appropriately (and thus whose replacements might not have the appropriate fidelity). Currently, only dates, URLs, phone numbers, and can be flagged in this way; no labels are flagged by default. Any flagged elements must be corrected before the transform step is executed.

The nominate step also accepts the following options, but they're pretty exotic and you're very unlikely to use them (they're also not particularly well tested or supported):

Command-line option
XML attribute
cache_case_sensitivity a semicolon-separated sequence of tag names, e.g. 'PERSON;LOCATION'
In some cases, the replacer for the given tag maintains an internal cache, to ensure, e.g., that variations in names are replaced consistently throughout a document. Names and institutions are the most obvious replacers which use a cache. By default, the caches are not case-sensitive; this setting allows the user to specify that some of them are. You will likely never need this setting.
cache_scope a semicolon-separated sequence of <tag>,doc|batch|none, e.g. 'PERSON,batch;LOCATION;doc'
By default, if there is a cache for a tag replacer strategy, its scope is the document; at each document boundary, the cache is flushed. If you want to change this scope, you can declare that it persists for the entire document batch ('batch') or turn off cacheing entirely ('none'). You will likely never need this setting.
resource_file_repl a semicolon-separated sequence of <file>=<repl>
The replacement strategies are driven by a large number of data files which are used as sources for randomly created fillers. In some cases, you may want to replace these files with files of your own. We're not going to document the way this works, or how to use it, because it's just too arcane; the source file core/python/ in the deidentification source code will help you understand how to use it.


The transform step allows you to insert a prologue into your file.

Command-line option
XML attribute
prologue a string
Specify the text of a prologue to insert into the transformed document. You may wish to do this, e.g., to assert that all names in the document are fake. This option takes preference over --prologue_file.
prologue_file a filename
Specify a file which contains the text of a prologue to insert into the transformed document. You may wish to do this, e.g., to assert that all names in the document are fake. The file is assumed to be in UTF-8 encoding. --prologue takes preference over this option. If the filename is not an absolute filename, it will be interpreted relative to the directory of the task which is being trained for. (This is because this option more likely to be provided in your task.xml file rather than on the command line.)

Note: if you subsequently attempt to create a raw file from the transformed MAT document, you must save it using an appropriate encoding. E.g., if your prologue file contains characters which can't be encoded in ASCII, then you can't use the default ASCII output encoding for your raw file.
dont_transform a string
A comma-separated list of annotation labels you do not want to convert when generating a transformed document. E.g., you may want to generate a variant of your transformed corpus in which dates aren't redacted.

MATEngine example

Here's a standard use of MATEngine in this task. Let's say you want to prepare a deidentified copy of a document with fake but realistic English replacement PII elements, in rich format, and you have a prologue in prologue.txt that you want to insert, and you have a default model in your task. Here's how it works:

% $MAT_PKG_HOME/bin/MATEngine --task 'My Deid Task' --workflow Demo \
--steps 'zone,tag,nominate,transform' --replacer 'clear -> clear' \
--input_file /path/to/my/file.txt --input_file_type raw \
--output_file /path/to/my/resynth/file.txt.json --output_file_type mat-json \
--tagger_local --prologue_file prologue.txt

The --tagger_local option is required because by default,  the Carafe tagging task attempts to contact the tagging server.

Running deidentification experiments

The sample experiment described here is a good place to start for constructing experiments for the MATExperimentEngine. The primary differences you should keep in mind are:

So if your task is named 'My Deid Task', then your simple experiment might look like this:

<experiment task='My Deid Task'>
<corpora dir="corpora">
<partition name="train" fraction=".8"/>
<partition name="test" fraction=".2"/>
<corpus name="test">
<model_sets dir="model_sets">
<model_set name="test">
<training_corpus corpus="test" partition="train"/>
<runs dir="runs">
<args steps="zone,tag" workflow="Demo"/>
<run name="test" model="test">
<test_corpus corpus="test" partition="test"/>

Customizing deidentification replacement

In MIST 1.2, we've added a (very experimental) capability to customize the deidentification replacement. This capability is available only with clear -> clear replacement. To understand how to use it, you'll need to know a bit more about how the replacement works.

Each replacement strategy consists of a digester and a renderer. The digester produces a pattern which describes the features of the digested element (e.g., for a phone number, was an area code present). The digested pattern also contains the raw source filler, and, in the case of the clear digester, the parsed form of the input in some cases (e.g., for names and locations). The renderer uses the pattern to generate its replacement, and, in the case of the clear renderer, attempts to apply any customization rules it finds.

The customization rules are provided to the nominate step either with the replacement_map or the replacement_map_file option. The replacement map is a JSON string which has the format described immediately below; the replacement_map_file provides a filename which contains such a string.

The JSON string described a JSON hash (object) whose keys are the file basenames which you're trying to deidentify; e.g., if you're trying to deidentify /path/to/my/file.txt as in the example above, the key for that file would be "file.txt". As a special case, if you're accessing the MIST capability via the Web service, the name of the file should be "<cgi>". The values of these keys should be another JSON object whose keys are the names of the labels you're targeting. So if you have rules for file.txt which target the DATE tag, your replacement map will look like this so far:

{"file.txt": {"DATE": ...}}

The label key values are also JSON objects. These objects can have two keys: caseSensitive (either true or false) and rules, which should be a list of 2-element lists, where the first element of each sublist is the antecedent and the second is the consequent. The antecedent and consequent are each themselves JSON objects. The antecedent is a recursive structure which describes a subset of the digested pattern; the consequent contains two keys, seed and pattern, each of which describe updates to the seed and pattern, respectively.

Much of the details of this needs to be derived from the source code, but we provide a couple examples here.

Let's say you want to replace all occurrences of the last name "Marshall" for the NAME tag in the file file.txt with the last name "Bigelow". Your specification will look like this:

{"rules": [[{"parse": {"lastName": "Marshall"}}, {"seed": {"lastName": "Bigelow"}}]]}}}

All eligible rules apply. So if you want to replace the first name "Betty" with the first name "Phyllis", you can add another rule:

{"rules": [[{"parse": {"lastName": "Marshall"}}, {"seed": {"lastName": "Bigelow"}}],
[{"parse": {"firstName": "Betty"}}, {"seed": {"firstNameAlts": ["Phyllis"]}}]]}}}

If you want to replace them only when they're together, do this:

{"rules": [[{"parse": {"lastName": "Marshall", "firstName": "Betty"}},
{"seed": {"lastName": "Bigelow", "firstNameAlts": ["Phyllis"]}}]]}}}

If you only want to replace the literal string "Betty Marshall", do this:

{"rules": [[{"input": "Betty Marshall"},
{"seed": {"lastName": "Bigelow", "firstNameAlts": ["Phyllis"]}}]]}}}

(Note that the input key is available for all tags, while the details of the parse and pattern keys differ from tag to tag).

Let's say you want to control how much dates are shifted (dates are shifted by a consistent amount throughout a single document). Do this:

{"rules": [[{}, {"pattern": {"deltaDay": 5}}]]}}}

The deltaDay attribute of the pattern controls the date shift, and this rule applies the shift to all dates (because the antecedent is empty).

Finally, let's say you want to do a consistent substitution of certain IDs, e.g., patient IDs, for correlation with an external data escrow application which manages deidentification for your structured records. If your tag is IDNUM, you can do this:

{"rules": [[{"input": "PATNO67897"}, {"seed": {"id": "ID9938273"}}]]}}}

In the future, we hope to flesh out and further document this capability.

Accessing deidentification from Java

The MAT toolkit comes with a Java API which allows you to read and write MAT JSON documents, and access services provided by the MATWeb application. You can find documentation for the Java API under the "Core developer documentation" in your documentation sidebar.

One common use of the Java API is in incorporating deidentification capabilities in a larger Java application. Here's a Java fragment which shows you how to do that. Remember, you must make sure you have all the jars in the following directories in your class path:

import java.util.*;
import org.mitre.mat.core.*;
import org.mitre.mat.engineclient.*;

String res = "";
/* Modify the URL as needed. Only the host and port are required. */
String url = "http://localhost:7801";

/* This should be the name of your task, as expted by MATEngine. */
String task = "HIPAA Deidentification";
/* This should be the name of the workflow, as expected by MATEngine. */
String workflow = "Demo";
/* This should be the step sequence to perform, as expected by MATEngine. */
String steps = "zone,tag,nominate,transform";
HashMap<String, String> attrMap = new HashMap<String, String>();
/* This should be the name of the replacer you want to use. */
attrMap.put("replacer", "clear -> clear");

MATDocument doc = new MATDocument();

/* Your input string is the argument to setSignal(). */
doc.setSignal("Hello World");

/* Here's where you connect to the server. */
MATCgiClient client = new MATCgiClient(url);
try {
MATDocument resultDoc = (MATDocument) client.doSteps(doc, task,
workflow, steps, attrMap);
res = resultDoc.getSignal();
} catch (MATEngineClientException ex) {
/* Handle the error. */
System.out.println("Processing failed: " + ex.getMessage());
/* Do something with the retrieved deidentified text. */

Extensions to the workspaces

As we describe here, workspaces are actively-managed directory structures which encapsulate the standard workflows in MAT. Workspaces in the deidentification task have three extra document folders:

redact clears and populates the "redacted, rich" and "redacted, raw" folders in parallel, by applying a replacer to the specified documents in the core folder. This operation is intended to apply only to original documents, to produce redacted documents; the inverse resynthesize operation isn't available via the workspace. This operation is the equivalent of performing both the nominate and transform steps described above. It has the following options:

Command-line option
XML attribute
replacer one of the replacer UI names shown below
The name of the replacement strategy to be used. If the workflow has more than one replacer available, this setting is obligatory. This is most likely the only one of these settings you'll ever use.
dont_limit_to_gold "yes" (XML)
Under normal circumstances, the redaction will apply only to gold and reconciled documents. If this flag is present, it applies to all documents.
retain_existing "yes" (XML)
Don't clear the redacted folders first.

nominate performs just the nominate step and inserts a copy of the document which is decorated with nominations into the "nominated" folder. This latter folder supports the transform operation, which removes the document from the "nominated" folder and performs the remainder of the redact operation. This alternative, two-step workflow is provided for situations where the user wishes (or needs) to review the nominations. It has the following options:

Command-line option
XML attribute
replacer one of the replacer UI names shown below
The name of the replacement strategy to be used. If the workflow has more than one replacer available, this setting is obligatory. This is most likely the only one of these settings you'll ever use.
dont_limit_to_gold "yes" (XML)
Under normal circumstances, the nomination  will apply only to gold and reconciled documents. If this flag is present, it applies to all documents.

Extensions to the UI

File mode enhancements

The normal file and workspace mode document window configurations described here. The nomination and transformation steps require enhancements to the UI, as shown in this section. The document exhibited is drawn from the CMC free text corpus of deidentified radiology reports.

First, we show the result of the tag step:

Note not just the additional steps in the workflow, but also the menu labeled "Replacer" to the right of the workflow menu. This menu allows you to select the replacement method for the PII elements. The nominate step requires a replacer. Here's the result of the nominate step:

Note that the user has selected a replacer, and once the nominate step is completed, a table appears below the document showing each PII, along with its type, its location in the document, and its proposed replacement. The final transform step inserts a second document pane:

Note that the replacement document also has a menu to save the replacement. These controls are separate from the original document; i.e., if you select "mat-json" from the "Save" menu above the replacement document, the replacement document (not the original document) will be saved as a rich MAT JSON document.

Workspace enhancements

If you're in the workspace, the relevant point you'll notice a difference is when viewing a document in the completed folder:

Like the file mode document window, this window has a replacer menu, and the folder allows you to access the new redact operation. Unlike file mode, the result of the redact operation will be a new document window, rather than a new pane in the existing window.

Working with replacements

The UI has two important enhancements available at the conclusion of the nominate step. First, when you mouse over an annotation, the redaction is shown in the status line as well as in the table below the main document pane:


In addition, if you're not satisfied with the replacement, you can edit the replacement by clicking on the appropriate cell in the "Replacement" column in the table below the main document pane:


If you modify the replacement and click "OK", the result will be what's used as the replacement (at least, as long as you don't undo and redo the "nominate" step).

Note: this is not the procedure for marking a previously unmarked PII; if you want to do that, you have the opportunity after the "tag" step to review and modify the automated annotations.

Flagged unparseable seeds and forced review

If you flag unparseable seeds in the nominate step, the document will be marked in such a way that whenever it's presented, it will warn you that unparseable seeds are present and must be reviewed:

[Nominate with

The nomination table 'Replacement' column will contain at least one cell with a red background:


Clicking on this cell to review the nomination clears the warning flag for that element. If the unparseable element is a date, you'll be presented with the current date offset as a guide:


If you attempt to transform the document before you clear all these flags, the transform step will fail and you'll get an error.

The process in workspaces is quite similar. If you attempt the "Redact" operation in the "completed" folder, you'll get an error if the nominate step generated any of these unparseable flags; in this situation, you should employ the alternative two-step workflow, by performing the "Nominate" operation instead.

Replacement, redaction and resynthesis

The nomination step generates replacement fillers for the PII elements identified by the content annotations. We identify two types of replacement strategies:

The core deidentification system provides three basic types of redaction:

Either of the first two outputs is a candidate for resynthesis, as is the original clear text.

The replacement engine itself is inspired by the replacement engine written to prepare the corpora for the AMIA 2006 evaluation of deidentification technologies in medical documents. We have completely rewritten it, and expanded it considerably.

The replacement engine first gathers a set of features from the input PII. For instance, in the case of names, it attempts to reproduce the number of tokens, the capitalization pattern, whether they correspond to a name with the last name first, etc. For dates, it attempts to preserve the offset from the earliest date in the document, as well as the specific details of how the date was formatted. Any features which cannot be determined from the input are assigned randomized values based on a weighted, hand-crafted estimation of the frequency of the possible values.

Once the feature values are determined, the engine generates replacement fillers. In the case of redaction, the fillers are trivially produced from the gathered features; in the case of resynthesis, the problem is considerably more complex, because our target is realistic English clear text. In the resynthesis case, the tokens for the replacement fillers are drawn from a variety of sources, including weighted lists of first and last names provided by the US Census, and lists of cities, states, streets, medical facilities and ZIP codes derived from various on-line resources. The replacement fillers are assembled based on the features the engine has already gathered; so, for instance, if the engine has determined that a name consists of a last name followed by a first name and an initial (as it might determine from a pattern like **NAME[AAA, BBB M] or a PII such as "Philips, Bruce R."), it will generate a new filler like “Ahmad, Jane Q”. Similarly, date offsets are preserved, so that the pair of dates Jan. 17 and Jan. 20 are shifted, but the 3 day difference is preserved. The engine also caches replaced name tokens on a document-by-document basis; so "AAA" will correspond to "Ahmad" throughout the document shown.

The resynthesis engine can be modified in a number of ways: where the replacement fillers are drawn from (e.g., an external lexicon or the corpus itself), how the fillers are constructed (whether they're replaced whole or reconstructed token-by-token), and how the fillers are cached for repetition (by document, by corpus, or without any cacheing). We will not document those customizations right now.

Extensions to the task.xml file

Each workflow in this task can be associated with replacers. This is specified in the <settings> section of task.xml. The specification pairs attribute-value settings, where the first attribute-value pair is an arbitrary name of a replacer set and a comma-separated list of replacer implementations, and the second attribute-value pair is "<name>_workflows" and a comma-separated list of workflow names. The interpretation is that the specified replacers are available during the nomination step of the specified workflows. Here's an example:

<value>Demo,Hand annotation,Review/repair</value>

So the interpretation here is that the "Resynthesize" workflow has the replacer BracketReplacementEngine.BracketResynthesisEngine available, and the other three workflows have the other replacers available.

Here are the available default replacers:

UI name
clear -> [ ]
Maps clear text PIIs to the bracketed name of the tag, e.g., "John Smith" -> "[PERSON]"
clear -> char repl
Obscures clear text PIIs by replacing alphanumeric characters with characters of the same type: "John Smith" -> "Pqty Muwqd"
clear -> clear
Replaces clear text PIIs with fake, synthesized but realistic clear text PIIs
[ ] -> clear
Maps PIIs obscured with the BracketReplacementEngine to clear text

There are also replacers available to manage the De-ID-style replacement, but those have to be customized in a child task.

Defining your own deidentification task

At some point, you may want to define your own deidentification task. We really don't recommend this, because much of the magic to make this work is undocumented. If you must do this, start by copying the entire directory structure of an existing deidentification task (your distribution will contain at least one). Do not copy the core task.

Once you've copied the task directory, you'll need to make the following changes to that task to so that MIST can recognize it:

At this point, you can use MATManagePluginDirs to install the new task, and edit it further to change the annotations, etc. If you change the annotations, note that you'll also have to change the way your task maps the annotations to replacer categories. Typically, this is controlled by reference to a class-level variable "categories" in the Python class which is the Python class corresponding to your task (as specified in the class attribute of the <task> element in task.xml). This section of the code is pretty hairy; we don't have the resources to document the procedure in any more detail than this.

Unless you intend to provide documentation for your task, you can remove the <doc_enhancement_class> element from your task.xml file. You do not need to change the name of any JS or CSS files which are included with the task you've copied. You can change them if you want, in which case you must also change their references in your task.xml file.